Jan. 1, 2025

A Good Year for Whistleblowers

As we begin 2025, it is a good moment to take a look back at a year that has been very good for whistleblowers. In March, DOJ officials announced their intention to launch a whistleblower rewards program, similar to the SEC’s long-standing – and lucrative – program. Less than six months later, the Whistleblower Awards Pilot Program went live. In the interim, the DOJ also introduced a program to encourage whistleblowers who might have been involved in wrongdoing by offering incentives to come forward in exchange for a non-prosecution agreement. Together, these developments, along with a few other policy changes and tweaks, have made whistleblowing – and the pressure it puts on companies – one of the hottest topics of 2024. This retrospective features some of our most popular articles that touch on whistleblowing. The Anti-Corruption Report will resume its regular publication schedule on January 15, 2025. Happy New Year!

DOJ’s New VSD Program Offers NPAs to Individuals Who Can Help Catch Bigger Fish

On April 15, 2024, the DOJ’s Criminal Division announced a new Pilot Program that offers wrongdoers non-prosecution agreements (NPAs) if they turn themselves – and their co‑conspirators – in. To be eligible to receive an NPA under the Pilot Program, an individual must clear several hurdles, some of which carry significant risk. Only certain individuals will qualify and, those who do must provide specific kinds of information and be willing to cooperate in the resulting investigation and prosecution, all while admitting to their own guilt in the matter. Which raises the question: Is it worth the risk? The Anti-Corruption Report spoke with experts in the field to find out. This article distilled their insights.

DOJ’s Corporate Whistleblower Awards Pilot Program Series

Sticking to the tight schedule it set in March 2024, the DOJ’s new Corporate Whistleblower Awards Pilot Program (WAPP) went live on August 1, 2024. The Anti-Corruption report spoke with both defense and whistleblower counsel about the nuances of the program. The first article in a two-part series examined the WAPP’s limitation to cases involving forfeiture and the surprising fact that some culpable individuals can receive awards. Part two analyzed some of the specifics of who is and is not eligible for an award, how the program encourages strong speak-up cultures at companies and the DOJ’s focus on companies that might impede whistleblowing through non-disclosure agreements.

Government Enforcers Explain Their Approach to Whistleblowers and VSD

In the first half of 2024, multiple branches of the DOJ introduced programs designed to encourage individuals with information about white-collar crime to come forward by offering incentives to individuals who have merely witnessed crimes as well as those who may have participated in a crime. Government enforcers provided their perspectives on how the programs will work, what they will hopefully accomplish, and some of their limitations at the New York City Bar Association’s White Collar Crime Institute. This article analyzed their comments and highlighted the most illuminating insights.

Whistleblower Protection and Compliance: A Comparative Study of the United States and Japan

Whistleblowing plays a crucial role in uncovering corporate misconduct, fraud, and violations of law and regulations. As organizations become increasingly complex and global, the importance of robust whistleblower protection and compliance frameworks has grown significantly, but different countries approach encouraging and protecting whistleblowers in different ways. In this guest article, Lowenstein Sandler partner Robert Johnston and associate Kei Komuro compared the whistleblower protection and compliance landscapes in the United States and Japan, two of the world’s largest economies, with distinct legal and cultural contexts, revealing both similarities and significant differences.

The Price Is Right? How DOJ’s New Whistleblower and NPA Policies Could Bring Unexpected Costs

In early 2024, the DOJ created significant new incentives to encourage more individuals to self-report and to help the DOJ develop more corporate cases for prosecution. The new policies, however, may bring unintended consequences that could both complicate government enforcement efforts and hamper companies’ ability to self-police and remediate misconduct. In this guest article, Vinson & Elkins attorneys unpacked the DOJ’s new whistleblower and non-prosecution agreement policies for self-reporting and identified areas of concern that corporate compliance officers will be forced to navigate in the evolving landscape.